Lifestyle | MSN Slideshow

10 Iconic Food Brands That Changed Their Recipe and Faced Backlash

This post may contain affiliate links. Please see our disclosure policy for details.

Big food brands sometimes think a recipe update is no big deal—until their fans revolt. Whether it’s cutting costs, chasing health trends, or tweaking for new markets, those changes can hit a nerve. People form deep connections to the flavors they grew up with, and messing with that can feel personal.

Even the smallest shift in taste or texture can spark outrage, with customers flooding social media and demanding the original back. These moments prove one thing: when it comes to food, loyalty runs deep. Here are 10 iconic brands that changed their recipe—and instantly regretted it.

Kellogg’s (Sugar Smacks Renaming)

Kellogg's corporate.
Photo Credit: Etcityimage2/Depositphotos.

In an effort to promote a healthier image, Kellogg’s briefly changed the name of its Sugar Smacks cereal to “Honey Smacks” and altered the recipe to reduce sugar. However, consumers missed the original, sweeter taste and the familiar name. The company eventually reverted to the original name and a similar recipe, proving that sometimes, even well-intentioned diet changes can backfire.

Coca-Cola

Photo Credit: Kaboompics/Pexels

Perhaps the most infamous example in food history, Coca-Cola’s 1985 launch of “New Coke” to compete with Pepsi was a monumental misstep. Despite blind taste tests favoring the new, sweeter formula, loyalists revolted, inundating the company with calls and letters demanding the old recipe back. The backlash was so intense that Coca-Cola brought back “Coke Classic” just 79 days later, a stark reminder that some things are best left untouched. This marketing gaffe is often cited in business schools, demonstrating that brand loyalty runs deep.

Tropicana (Packaging Redesign)

Photo Credit: Bettybl/Flickr

While not a recipe change, Tropicana’s 2009 redesign of its orange juice packaging felt like a completely different product to many. Consumers complained it looked generic and cheap, losing the classic image they recognized. Sales plummeted by 20% in just two months, forcing the company to revert to its original design. It goes to show that even visual changes can feel like a direct assault on a beloved pantry staple.

Cadbury Creme Egg

Photo Credit: Flickr

In 2015, Cadbury, under new ownership by Mondelez International, changed the chocolate shell recipe for its beloved Creme Eggs, moving from its traditional Dairy Milk chocolate to a cheaper cocoa mix. Fans, particularly in the UK, were outraged, claiming the change ruined the taste and texture of their Easter treat. Sales dipped, proving that even a small ingredient alteration can cause a big stir, especially for cherished holiday recipe collections.

Heinz Ketchup

Photo Credit: Erik Mclean/Pexels

Heinz, responding to calls for reducing high-fructose corn syrup, experimented with different sweeteners in some of its ketchup products. While the intention was potentially healthy, long-time fans noticed a change in the classic sweet and tangy flavor. For a condiment as ubiquitous as ketchup, even a minor alteration to its recipe can spark a debate about additives and authenticity among consumers.

Domino’s Pizza

Photo Credit: Todd Van Hoosear/Wikimedia Commons

In 2009, Domino’s made a bold move, admitting their pizza recipe was, frankly, not great. They launched a campaign showcasing their complete overhaul of the crust, sauce, and cheese, aiming for a more appealing taste. While initially met with skepticism, the honest approach and genuine improvements eventually won over many customers, turning a potential disaster into a growth story for the brand.

Lay’s (Reduced Fat Potato Chips)

Photo Credit: Monticello/Depositphotos

When Lay’s introduced its “reduced fat” potato chips using the fat substitute Olestra in the 1990s, they aimed for a healthier diet option. However, Olestra caused digestive issues for many consumers, leading to widespread complaints and even some unfortunate side effects. The backlash was so severe that it became a cautionary tale for the food industry about ingredient substitution.

McDonald’s Arch Deluxe

Photo Credit: PatrickRich/Flickr

McDonald’s introduced the Arch Deluxe in the mid-90s, an attempt to appeal to a more “adult” palate with a sophisticated burger. Despite a massive marketing campaign, the recipe and concept didn’t resonate with customers, who preferred McDonald’s classic, simpler offerings. It was a costly flop that showed even giants can misjudge their core audience’s food preferences. According to Eater, McDonald’s lost an estimated $200 million on the Arch Deluxe.

Coors Banquet Beer

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

In the 1980s, Coors made a minor change to the recipe of its flagship Banquet Beer, altering the brewing process slightly. Despite the subtle nature of the change, loyal drinkers in its core markets quickly detected a difference in taste. The backlash led Coors to revert to the traditional recipe, showing that even small adjustments to a beloved beverage can have a big impact on consumer interest.

Perrier (Benzene Contamination)

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

While not a deliberate recipe change, the 1990 discovery of benzene contamination in Perrier mineral water led to a global recall and a massive hit to the brand’s reputation for healthy, pure water. The incident deeply shook consumer trust and took years for the brand to recover from, highlighting the critical importance of food safety and public health. It was a daunting challenge for the brand.

Kraft (Macaroni & Cheese Changes)

Photo Credit: Mike Mozart/Flickr

Kraft faced immense pressure to remove artificial colors and preservatives from its iconic Macaroni & Cheese recipe. When they quietly made the change in 2016, many long-time fans claimed they noticed a difference in taste and color, sparking online debate. While some welcomed the healthier food approach, others lamented the alteration of a cherished comfort food. It underscored the delicate balance between public health concerns and consumer nostalgia for a familiar taste.

Disclaimer This list is solely the author’s opinion based on research and publicly available information. It is not intended to be professional advice.

How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025—No Experience Needed

Image Credit: dexteris via 123RF

How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025

I used to think investing was something you did after you were already rich. Like, you needed $10,000 in a suit pocket and a guy named Chad at some fancy firm who knew how to “diversify your portfolio.” Meanwhile, I was just trying to figure out how to stretch $43 to payday.

But a lot has changed. And fast. In 2025, building wealth doesn’t require a finance degree—or even a lot of money. The tools are simpler. The entry points are lower. And believe it or not, total beginners are stacking wins just by starting small and staying consistent.

Click here and let’s break down how.

5 Easy Steps to Change Any Habit

Habits.
Andrzej Rostek via Shutterstock.

5 Easy Steps to Change Any Habit

We all click on them with the hope that just THIS time the secret to changing a bad habit or adopting a healthy one will be revealed and we’ll finally be able to stick to that diet, stop that one or ten things that might in the moment make us feel temporarily good but really just make us fat, unhealthy, sad, mad or just frustrated with ourselves.