You’ve seen the buzzwords in school newsletters and PTA meetings—”21st-century skills,” “student-centered learning,” “data-driven instruction”—but what if some of these shiny new ideas are actually making things worse for our kids?
Schools are in a constant state of reinvention, continually seeking the next big thing to enhance learning. However, good intentions don’t always yield good results. We’re going to pull back the curtain on 15 popular school practices that sound great on paper but are showing some serious cracks in the real world.
While schools are constantly evolving to serve our kids better, some of the most popular new practices—from tech-filled classrooms to new grading systems—are showing signs of backfiring, and the data is telling a surprising story.
Let’s get into what the research, experts, and teachers on the ground are actually saying.
“Zero Tolerance” for Any Misbehavior
The goal was to create safer schools with a simple, strict rule: certain offenses result in automatic, severe punishment, such as suspension or expulsion. No exceptions.
But these policies haven’t made schools safer. Instead, they’ve created a devastating “school-to-prison pipeline” that disproportionately harms minority students and those with disabilities. By 2001, these policies led to 3.1 million students being suspended annually, nearly double the number from 1974.
Here’s the kicker: the policies are rarely used for their intended purpose. Only 5% of suspensions or expulsions nationally are for bringing a weapon to school. Most are for minor, subjective infractions. The American Psychological Association conducted an extensive review and found “no evidence” that zero-tolerance policies increase discipline consistency or improve school safety. In fact, schools with higher suspension rates often have worse ratings of school climate.
The most damaging outcome is the glaring racial disparity. A federal study of Chicago Public Schools found Black boys were 23% of the student population but 61% of those expelled. Nationally, middle schools expel Black students at four times the rate of white students. Suspension is a strong predictor of dropping out, which in turn fuels the school-to-prison pipeline.
The policy, designed to improve behavior, actively creates the conditions for academic failure and alienation.
Giving Every Student a Laptop or Tablet (1:1 Tech)
Putting technology in every student’s hands to prepare them for a digital future sounds like a no-brainer. What could go wrong? A lot, it turns out. These devices are often becoming massive sources of distraction, technical headaches, and even inequity.
The 2022 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) results are even more telling: about two-thirds of U.S. students report being distracted by their own devices in class. Students who reported this distraction scored, on average, 15 points lower in mathematics. One teacher on X (formerly Twitter) summed up the frustration: Devices consume so much class time, with kids experiencing internet issues and needing to charge. It was much more efficient to use paper.
It’s not just about distraction; it’s about what’s being lost. Teachers report that students in the “1:1 era” are losing the ability to show their work in math, refusing to write, and can’t explain their thinking because the device provides them with the answer. There’s also a “cognitive load foggy glaze” that teachers see, where the deep “I get it” connection doesn’t click as often with digital assignments.
The push for 1:1 Tech was meant to close the digital divide, but it may be creating a new “skills divide” where some kids become passive tech consumers while others learn to be active creators.
Project-Based Learning Without Clear Structure
Moving away from boring lectures to have students work on engaging, real-world projects sounds amazing. It’s meant to teach collaboration, critical thinking, and problem-solving. But when it’s poorly planned, project-based learning (PBL) can devolve into chaos. Critics argue that PBL “places too much responsibility on novice learners” and can “undermine content knowledge and subject fluency”. A common failure is focusing on a flashy final “product over process,” where the actual learning gets lost.
Then there’s the dilemma of group work. A major challenge is “problematic group dynamics,” where a few students do all the work while others contribute nothing. This leads to conflict and makes it impossible to assess what each student actually learned.
This can create a new kind of inequity. When projects are done at home, it often becomes a “science fair” competition between parents. As one teacher lamented, the winning projects are “clearly not done by elementary age children,” which is “discriminatory toward students who do the work themselves”.
Without a strong foundation of direct instruction, students who are already behind are set adrift, while students who already have a strong base succeed, thus widening the achievement gap.
Ditching Traditional Desks for Flexible Seating
The idea is to let kids choose where they work—on wobble stools, couches, or the floor—to increase comfort and engagement.
For many teachers, though, it’s a “classroom-management disaster” that leads to distraction and chaos, with little hard evidence of academic benefits. University of Virginia psychology professor Daniel Willingham notes there’s a lack of meaningful research documenting a real effect on student achievement.
While one study found 78% of college students felt they could concentrate better with flexible seating, another survey of elementary children found that logical reasoning scores were actually higher when children were seated in traditional single desks.
The “coffee shop” classroom model appears innovative, but its adoption is often driven by trendiness rather than rigorous evidence of improved learning outcomes.
School-Wide Mandatory Mindfulness Sessions
Teaching students mindfulness techniques to help them manage stress and improve focus seems like a great idea in today’s anxious world.
However, large-scale studies are finding that universal, one-size-fits-all mindfulness programs don’t improve mental health and can actually make things worse for some students. The largest-ever research, the MYRIAD trial with over 28,000 students, found “no evidence” that the program had a positive impact on students’ mental health.
A key reason for the failure was engagement—on average, students completed their mindfulness homework only once over the entire 10-week course. More concerning, another extensive study reported that the practice “actually caused more problems among many students with prior mental health issues”.
For students with a history of trauma, being forced into quiet reflection “can actually bring about unwelcome thoughts, feelings and sensations more clearly into awareness,” potentially causing the “re-experiencing of traumatic memories”.
The push for school-wide mindfulness may be a low-cost attempt to “fix” a complex mental health crisis without addressing the root causes.
Restorative Justice Without Full Buy-In
In response to the failure of zero-tolerance policies, restorative justice focuses on repairing harm and building relationships, rather than just punishing students.
But when it’s implemented poorly—without sufficient funding, training, and staff buy-in—it can collapse. The programs are fragile. They often depend on a single champion who holds everything together or on temporary grant funding that eventually runs out. A primary barrier is “the resistance by educators to change from using punitive discipline,” often stemming from “entrenched beliefs regarding student discipline”.
This creates a confusing environment where one teacher facilitates a healing circle. At the same time, another student is sent to the office for the same behavior, thereby undermining the trust required for the system to function effectively.
“No-Zero” Grades and Banning Homework
The goal is to stop penalizing students with zeros for missing work, which can significantly impact their grade and undermine their motivation.
However, these policies can enable students to do the bare minimum, leaving them unprepared for the real world. Many students learned to subvert the system and would do nothing for two quarters… they knew they could take half of a year off and still pass.
This experience led Leominster Public Schools in Massachusetts to rescind their no-zero policy. The principal said, “We really felt that after years of doing it that way, kids just weren’t learning to be responsible”. A recent study found that lenient grading policies increased GPAs without improving actual student achievement and led to an increase in school absences among low-ability students.
The short-term “equity” of preventing a failing grade may lead to a long-term inequity by failing to prepare students for the realities of post-secondary life, ultimately setting them up for failure in a higher-stakes environment.
Teaching Reading With the “Whole Language” Approach
The theory was that kids learn to read naturally by being immersed in great books, focusing on meaning and context rather than phonics drills.
Decades of cognitive science have disproven this theory. Reading is not a natural skill, and millions of children have been left behind. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress report, only about 35% of American children read proficiently or better. A massive review of over 100,000 studies found that only 5 to 10 percent of kids learn to read easily; the majority require explicit, systematic phonics instruction.
Children who received the intervention in 1st grade had lower reading scores in 3rd and 4th grades than their peers who didn’t. The program proved to be actively harmful in the long run. Despite the overwhelming evidence, the approach persists. Some K-2 and special education teachers report that they are still using these disproven methods.
This ideological battle is being fought at the expense of children’s literacy.
The One-Size-Fits-All Common Core Standards
The idea was to create a single, rigorous set of K-12 math and English standards to ensure that all students graduate ready for college and careers, regardless of their location.
But more than a decade later, there’s no convincing evidence it worked. A 2021 Brookings Institution report concluded that “no convincing evidence exists that the standards had a significant, positive impact on student achievement.”
The implementation was a mess. It was widely seen as a “one-size-fits-all” approach that ignores student individuality. Critics called it a “national curriculum” in disguise, dictating “what should be taught, how it should be taught, and when it should be taught”. By 2015, the initial wave of adoption had reversed, with states like Arizona, Indiana, and Oklahoma withdrawing their support.
The backlash wasn’t just about the standards themselves. Common Core became a Trojan horse for a massive increase in high-stakes testing and other unpopular reforms, making it a symbol for a much larger battle over the future of public education.
Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs That Miss the Mark
The idea is to teach children “soft skills” such as empathy and self-awareness to help them succeed in life.
But what should be a universal concept has become a political lightning rod. Critics on the right call it “radical indoctrination,” while some on the left water it down into feel-good activities with no substance.
The biggest problem is how SEL is being combined with behavioral control systems. Instead of helping kids develop intrinsic motivation, it becomes another tool for compliance. The message becomes: “Use your calming strategies or lose a point”. This isn’t authentic social-emotional learning; it’s “performative regulation under the threat of consequence”.
The politicization and misapplication of SEL are making the term itself toxic, threatening the very real and necessary work of supporting student well-being.
Pushing School Choice and Voucher Programs
The pitch is to provide parents with public funds (vouchers) to send their children to private schools, thereby forcing public schools to improve through competition.
However, the research shows that vouchers often fail to improve student achievement and divert critical funds from the public schools that educate 90% of children. Recent long-term studies found that voucher students experienced significant declines in academic performance. The negative impact on math scores was found to rival the learning loss caused by Hurricane Katrina.
These programs are also devastating state budgets. Arizona’s universal voucher program helped create a one-billion-dollar state budget shortfall. And they aren’t a real “choice” for many, as private schools can discriminate based on ability, religion, and more.
The consistent negative academic results suggest the goal isn’t just educational reform, but a political strategy aimed at dismantling the public education system.
Full Classroom Inclusion Without the Right Support
The law and the moral imperative are clear: students with disabilities should be educated in general education classrooms alongside their peers whenever possible.
However, without adequate funding, training, and support staff, “full inclusion” can fail to benefit everyone. Even when students are physically present, their participation can be “hollow,” more akin to “going through the motions” than genuine learning.
General education teachers are often not prepared to manage a classroom with a wide range of complex needs and limited resources. There is often a “disconnect between legal obligation and actual implementation of accommodations,” leading to frustration and failure.
This puts the moral weight of a laudable social goal on the shoulders of individual teachers without providing the systemic support required for success, setting everyone up to fail.
Turning Kindergarten Into the New First Grade
The logic seems sound: get kids started on academics earlier to give them a head start.
But pushing intense academics on 4- and 5-year-olds can backfire spectacularly. A landmark Tennessee study on its state-run Pre-K program found that by 6th grade, students who attended the academic-focused Pre-K had lower state achievement test scores than kids who didn’t participate in the program. They also had higher rates of disciplinary infractions.
Psychologist Peter Gray summarizes the research: initial academic gains from this approach “wash out within 1 to 3 years and, at least in some studies, are eventually reversed”.
This “academic pushdown” is a direct consequence of the accountability pressures from standardized testing in upper grades, forcing the development of skills that are inappropriate for younger and younger children.
The Intense Focus on Standardized Testing
The idea was simple: use standardized tests to hold schools accountable and measure student progress. However, it has become a national obsession.
Instead of measuring what kids know, these tests often measure how good a student is at taking tests, all while creating massive anxiety and ignoring essential skills. Research shows that as high-stakes tests loom, students’ cortisol (the stress hormone) levels spike by an average of 15%, which is linked to an 80-point drop in SAT scores. For students already facing hardships, such as poverty, cortisol levels can increase by a staggering 35%.
The tests don’t just stress kids out; they’re also poor indicators of actual ability. An analysis found that SAT and ACT scores are better proxies for a student’s family wealth than their academic ability. This is why hundreds of universities, including all eight Ivy League schools and the entire University of California system, have dropped SAT/ACT scores from their admissions process.
These colleges are sending a clear signal: the tests that K-12 schools revolve around aren’t telling the whole story.
The Quiet Rise of Grade Inflation
This one is subtle. The idea is to be encouraging and focus on growth.
But high school GPAs are steadily rising without a corresponding increase in knowledge, devaluing grades and making it harder to know who is actually prepared for college. An ACT report found that the average high school GPA increased from 3.17 in 2010 to 3.36 in 2021, while achievement on standardized tests remained either flat or declined.
“Grade inflation is real, it is widespread, and it weakens the value of student transcripts,” said ACT CEO Janet Godwin. It creates a false sense of security for students and is exacerbated by the move to test-optional admissions, which places even more weight on these inflated GPAs.
The ACT report found that Black students and students from low-income families experienced higher rates of grade inflation, which can mask achievement gaps and create a bigger shock when these students arrive at college unprepared.
Grade inflation is the system’s “fever,” indicating a deeper illness caused by a combination of other failed practices on this list.
Key Takeaway
The road to a better education is paved with good intentions, but as the data shows, many of our most popular school reforms are having unintended consequences. From the anxiety of high-stakes testing to the false confidence of inflated grades, these practices often create new problems in their attempt to solve old ones.
The biggest lesson is that there are no simple, one-size-fits-all solutions. Real improvement requires listening to teachers, following the long-term evidence, and focusing on sound pedagogy over the latest trend.
Disclaimer – This list is solely the author’s opinion based on research and publicly available information. It is not intended to be professional advice.
Like our content? Be sure to follow us.
How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025—No Experience Needed
How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025
I used to think investing was something you did after you were already rich. Like, you needed $10,000 in a suit pocket and a guy named Chad at some fancy firm who knew how to “diversify your portfolio.” Meanwhile, I was trying to figure out how to stretch $43 to payday.
But a lot has changed. And fast. In 2025, building wealth doesn’t require a finance degree—or even a lot of money. The tools are simpler. The entry points are lower. And believe it or not, total beginners are stacking wins just by starting small and staying consistent.
Click here, and let’s break down how.
5 Easy Steps to Change Any Habit
5 Easy Steps to Change Any Habit
We all click on them with the hope that just THIS time, the secret to changing a bad habit or adopting a healthy one will be revealed. We’ll finally be able to stick to that diet, stop those one or ten things that might in the moment make us feel temporarily good but really make us fat, unhealthy, sad, mad, or just frustrated with ourselves.
