Lifestyle | MSN Slideshow

17 American BBQ favorites illegal in other countries

This post may contain affiliate links. Please see our disclosure policy for details.

Picture this: It’s a perfect summer afternoon. You’ve got ribs smoking, burgers sizzling, and a table overflowing with colorful snacks, sodas, and desserts. It’s a classic American scene.

Now, what if I told you that a massive chunk of that all-American spread would be illegal to serve in other countries?

The European Union and many other countries operate on something called the “precautionary principle.” It’s a fancy term for “better safe than sorry.” If there’s even a shadow of a doubt that an ingredient could be harmful, they ban it until manufacturers can prove it’s safe. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), on the other hand, often uses a “risk-based assessment”. This means a substance is generally allowed until regulators have overwhelming evidence that it’s harmful.

According to Melanie Benesh, an expert at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), this broken system allows companies to determine the safety of “most of new chemicals used in the food we eat every day.” It’s a system that can leave questionable chemicals in our food supply for decades. So, let’s fire up the grill and take a tour of the American BBQ favorites that wouldn’t cut it overseas.

Our Pork Ribs & Pulled Pork

Image Credit: Christian Geischeder/ Wikimedia Commons

There’s nothing quite like a rack of fall-off-the-bone ribs. But what helps get them to your plate might be a little unsettling. A growth-promoting drug called Ractopamine is fed to an estimated 60% to 80% of American pigs in the weeks before slaughter. Why? It boosts protein growth, making the animals leaner and the meat production process more profitable.

More than 160 countries have completely banned or restricted the use of Ractopamine in pork production. We’re talking about the entire European Union, Russia, and China, the world’s largest pork consumer. Their reasoning is twofold: animal welfare and human health. Studies and reports have linked the drug to serious side effects in pigs, including increased stress, heightened aggression, painful lameness, and even death during transport.

The FDA, however, stands firm, stating that its own studies found the levels of ractopamine residue in meat are safe for human consumption.

That Juicy Beef Brisket

Image Credit: Josh Evnin/ Wikimedia Commons

Low-and-slow smoked brisket is the king of Texas BBQ. But the hormones used to raise the cattle, such as zeranol and trenbolone acetate, have been at the center of a global food fight for decades. These hormones are implanted in the majority of U.S. beef cattle to help them bulk up faster on less feed.

This practice is a hard “no” in the European Union, which banned all imports of hormone-treated beef way back. The EU raised concerns about the potential long-term health risks for consumers, such as hormone disruption. The U.S. argues the ban is an unfair trade barrier not based on science, while the EU stands by its precautionary principle, insisting on its right to protect consumers from potential risks. This shows how “food safety” isn’t always just about science; it’s deeply tangled up in politics, economics, and public perception.

Classic American Hot Dogs

Image Credit: jaywennington/ Wikimedia Commons

What’s a BBQ without hot dogs on the grill? However, the sourcing of some of the meat would raise eyebrows and legal issues in Europe. Mechanically Separated Meat (MSM) from beef is a paste-like substance created by forcing animal bones with meat still attached through a sieve at high pressure. It’s an efficient, low-cost way to get every last bit of usable tissue off a carcass.

In the U.S., mechanically separated poultry is allowed in products like hot dogs and lunch meat. According to the Daily Reserve, after the “mad cow disease” (BSE) crisis, the U.S. implemented regulations that banned the use of mechanically separated meat derived from the spinal column and skull of cattle for human consumption in 2004.

Fearing that spinal cord tissue, which can carry the infectious prions that cause BSE, could get into the meat paste, the EU banned MSM from all ruminants (cattle, sheep, and goats). Their rules for poultry MSM are also much stricter, creating different classifications for “low-pressure” and “high-pressure” separation methods.

The All-American Burger Patty

Image Credit: Pundit/ Wikimedia Commons

You can’t have a BBQ without burgers. But the preservatives used to keep some ground meat and processed foods fresh are on the “do not fly” list in other parts of the world. BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) are added to a wide range of products, including burger patties, sausages, cereals, and potato chips, to prevent fats from going rancid.

So, what’s the problem? Well, the U.S. National Toxicology Program has classified BHA as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen“. BHA is also under review by the EU as a potential endocrine disruptor, meaning it could mess with our hormones.

Despite these serious red flags from its own government agencies, the FDA continues to allow BHA in our food.

Grilled Chicken Breasts

Image Credit: Sharon Chen/ Wikimedia Commons

Many health-conscious grillers opt for chicken. Chlorine Washing, a standard step in American poultry processing, is the very reason U.S. chicken has been banned from Europe for nearly 30 years. In the U.S., it’s common practice to wash poultry carcasses in an antimicrobial bath often containing chlorine to kill off bacteria like Salmonella and Campylobacter.

The EU banned this practice back in 1997. Here is the fascinating part: it’s not because they think the chicken itself is dangerous to eat. In fact, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) agrees with U.S. regulators that the chemical residues are unlikely to pose an immediate health risk.

The EU operates on a “farm-to-fork” principle, which demands high hygiene and animal welfare standards throughout the entire production process. The U.S. focuses on making sure the final product is clean; the EU focuses on making sure the whole process is clean from the start.

Soft Burger & Hot Dog Buns

Image Credit: jeffreyw/ Wikimedia Commons

That perfectly soft, squishy, and uniform bun that holds your burger? It might get its texture from additives that are illegal in many other countries. Potassium Bromate and Azodicarbonamide (ADA) are “dough conditioners.” They strengthen the flour, making the dough more elastic and allowing it to rise higher, which is perfect for mass-produced bread.

Potassium bromate is banned/restricted in the EU, Brazil, China, and India because the International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies it as a “possible human carcinogen“. ADA is banned in the EU and Australia because when it’s baked, it can create a byproduct called urethane, which is a known carcinogen.

The FDA allows both, arguing that in tiny amounts and with proper baking, they break down into harmless substances. The problem is, if the bread is underbaked or too much is added, harmful residues can remain.

That Box of Cornbread Mix

Image Credit: Image generated using A.I for Illustrative Purposes Only

A warm slice of cornbread is a BBQ staple. However, over the years, the mixes and shortenings used to produce it have depended on an ingredient that has come to be recognized as a significant health hazard. Partially Hydrogenated Oils (PHOs) are created by adding hydrogen to liquid vegetable oil, turning it into a solid fat. This gave products like shortening, margarine, and countless baked goods an incredibly long shelf life.

The problem? Artificial trans fats are devastating for heart health. They raise your “bad” (LDL) cholesterol while lowering your “good” (HDL) cholesterol, dramatically increasing the risk of heart disease. Dozens of countries, led by Denmark way back in 2003, banned PHOs. The World Health Organization even called for their complete global elimination.

This is one area where the U.S. finally caught up. After years of mounting evidence and public pressure, the FDA officially revoked the GRAS status for PHOs in 2015, and they were fully phased out of the American food supply. It’s a huge public health victory, but it also shows how the U.S. system can lag more than a decade behind other nations, even when the science is crystal clear.

Creamy Mac & Cheese

Image Credit: jeffreyw/ Wikimedia Commons

The neon-orange glow of boxed mac and cheese is a nostalgic sight for millions. However, the dyes that create that signature color come with a warning label in Europe. Artificial food dyes Yellow five and Yellow six are used in thousands of products to give them a bright, appealing color.

In the European Union, any food containing these dyes must carry a stark warning: “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children”. Some countries, like Norway and Iceland, have banned them altogether.

This is based on numerous studies, including a comprehensive 2021 report from California’s environmental health agency, which confirmed a link between synthetic dyes and neurobehavioral issues like hyperactivity in some kids.

The Side of Dill Pickles

Image Credit: Jonathunder/ Wikimedia Commons

Even the humble pickle isn’t safe. Some brands use artificial coloring, Yellow 5 (also known as Tartrazine), to achieve that perfect, uniform green hue. Just like in mac and cheese, this dye is used to make some pickles look more vibrant and appealing than they might naturally be.

And just like with other foods, this means pickles with Yellow 5 sold in the EU would need that warning label about potential effects on children’s behavior. Some people also report specific sensitivities or allergic reactions to Tartrazine, like hives or asthma.

The good news is that change is coming, albeit slowly. The FDA and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a plan for voluntary industry compliance to phase out six specific petroleum-based synthetic dyes, including Yellow 5.

Mountain Dew & Other Citrus Sodas

Image Credit: Marlith/ Wikimedia Commons

That cloudy look and tangy taste in your favorite citrus soda? For years, it was held together by an ingredient, Brominated Vegetable Oil (BVO), that contains a chemical also found in flame retardants. BVO is an emulsifier. It’s heavier than the flavoring oils but lighter than water, so it keeps the citrus flavors perfectly mixed into the soda instead of separating and floating to the top.

Sounds useful, right? The problem is the “brominated” part. Health authorities in Europe and Japan have been concerned for decades that bromine can build up in body fat, potentially harming the nervous system and thyroid function. Because of this, BVO has been banned in the UK since the 1970s and in the EU and Japan for over a decade.

This is another case where public pressure forced a change. Following an online petition by a teenager in Mississippi in 2013 that went viral, major food and beverage companies, such as PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, have decided to eliminate BVO in their beverages voluntarily. Following California’s lead in banning the chemical, the FDA finally issued a nationwide ban that took effect in 2024.

The Milk in Your Recipes (or Glass)

Image Credit: Santeri Viinamäki/ Wikimedia Commons

Whether it’s for a creamy potato salad or just a cold glass for the kids, the milk you use in the U.S. can come from cows treated with a synthetic hormone (Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH/rBST), which is illegal in most other major dairy-producing nations.

When injected into dairy cows, it can boost their milk production by 10-15%. So why is it banned in Canada, the EU, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan? The main reason isn’t human health; most regulators, including the FDA and the World Health Organization, agree that the milk is safe to drink. The bans are almost entirely due to animal welfare.

Research concluded that using rBST causes “severe and unnecessary pain, suffering and distress” for the cows. It’s associated with a significantly higher risk of painful udder infections (mastitis), foot problems, and reproductive issues.

The Cheese on Your Burger

Image Credit: Father.Jack/ Wikimedia Commons

This one is a little different. It’s not about a government ban, but about how the standards for “organic” and “natural” foods can be even stricter than federal laws. Natamycin (in organic cheese) is a naturally derived anti-fungal agent. It is commonly applied to the outside of shredded and other types of cheese as a mold-inhibitor and shelf-life extender.

The FDA and the European Food Safety Authority regard natamycin as being safe in this use. However, you won’t find it in products labeled “USDA Organic” or on the shelves at retailers like Whole Foods.

The USDA’s National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) has prohibited its use in organic production. They argue it’s not essential and, more importantly, they have concerns about promoting antibiotic resistance, since natamycin is also used as an anti-fungal medication in humans.

Store-Bought Pies & Frosted Cupcakes

Image Credit: David Trawin/ Wikimedia Commons

Those bright red frostings and cherry pie fillings that look so festive on the dessert table? For decades, they contained a dye (Red Dye No. 3) that the FDA knew was a carcinogen. This synthetic, petroleum-based dye gives a vibrant cherry-red color to thousands of products, especially seasonal candies like Valentine’s conversation hearts, candy corn, and PEZ.

Here’s where the story gets wild. In 1990, based on studies showing it caused thyroid cancer in rats, the FDA banned Red 3 in all cosmetics and topical drugs. You couldn’t put it in lipstick. But due to a bizarre regulatory loophole and industry pressure, the agency failed to ban it from the food we eat.

For 34 years, the U.S. lived in a “regulatory paradox” where a chemical was deemed too dangerous to put on your lips but was perfectly legal to put in your mouth and feed to your kids. After intense pressure from consumer groups and a ban passed in California, the FDA finally closed this loophole. Red Dye No. 3 will be banned from all foods and ingested drugs starting in January 2027.

The Candy Bowl (Skittles, M&Ms)

Image Credit: David Adam Kess/ Wikimedia Commons

A bowl of colorful candy is a BBQ staple. But the ingredient that makes many of those candies bright and opaque, Titanium Dioxide (E171), is no longer welcome in European food. It’s found in countless products, including Skittles, Starburst, Sour Patch Kids, and even some baked goods and sauces.

In 2022, the European Union banned it as a food additive. The European Food Safety Authority reviewed the science and concluded they could no longer rule out “genotoxicity concerns”. In plain English, they were worried that tiny nanoparticles of the substance could build up in the body and potentially damage our DNA.

The FDA disagrees. After reviewing the same European data, the agency stated it “continues to consider titanium dioxide safe for consumption,” creating the now-famous “Skittles divide”. In fact, when California passed its landmark food safety bill, titanium dioxide was originally on the list of banned substances but was removed at the last minute.

Tortillas for Wraps or Chips

Image Credit: David Boté Estrada/ Wikimedia Commons

Your tortillas may have a preservative, Propylparaben, that Europe banned almost twenty years ago. It is employed to inhibit mould and yeast, thus increasing the shelf-life of such products as tortillas, muffins, and food dyes.

The European Union banned propylparaben as a food additive way back in 2006. Why? Because a growing body of evidence suggests it’s an endocrine disruptor. Animal studies have linked it to disrupting hormone function and harming the reproductive system by reducing sperm counts and lowering testosterone levels in males.

The FDA still considers it “Generally Recognized as Safe”. However, the tide is turning. Propylparaben was one of the four chemicals banned in the California Food Safety Act, which takes effect in 2027. This is another case where a state is stepping in to regulate a chemical that the federal government won’t touch.

Grilled Farmed Salmon

Image Credit: Petar Milošević/ Wikimedia Commons

A lighter option for the grill, salmon is a popular choice. But the beautiful pink color of farmed salmon isn’t exactly natural, and it’s the source of a considerable controversy. The difference is that wild salmon obtain their pinkish-red color due to their diet, more specifically, to eating krill and other crustaceans, as they are rich in a pigment called astaxanthin.

Farmed salmon, raised on a diet of fishmeal pellets, would naturally have pale, off-white, or grayish flesh. Since nobody wants to buy gray salmon, farmers add astaxanthin to their feed. This pigment can be derived from natural sources like algae, or it can be synthesized from petrochemicals.

While the FDA and EFSA have approved synthetic astaxanthin for this use, critics argue it’s a cosmetic dye used to deceive consumers. While the industry claims the pigment is also an essential antioxidant for the fish’s health, the practice raises a fundamental question: As the industry has to add a pigment to the food to allow it to look like other fish in the wild, is this not an indication of a fault in the food?

The “Healthy” Sports Drinks

Image Credit: Coca Cola Enterprises Sverige AB/ Wikimedia Commons

When it’s hot out, it’s easy to reach for a brightly colored sports drink to rehydrate. But the most common food dye in America is one that requires a warning label in other parts of the world. Red 40 is everywhere. It’s the number one food dye used in the U.S. and is found in sports drinks, sodas, cereals, gelatin desserts, and thousands of other products.

Just like with Yellow 5 and Yellow 6, the European Union requires a warning label on any product containing Red 40, stating it “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children”. Norway and Iceland have gone a step further and banned it.

The concern is about the cumulative effect. American children are the biggest consumers of food dyes, and their consumption has increased in the last 50 years. The FDA’s safety models often look at one chemical at a time, but they may not capture the real-world risk of kids being exposed to a cocktail of multiple dyes from multiple sources, every single day.

Key Takeaway

Image Credit: Israel Albornoz/ Pexels

So, what does all this mean for your next cookout?

The reason your BBQ brisket might be banned in Berlin isn’t that one country is “right” and the other is “wrong.” It’s about two totally different ways of thinking about safety. The EU’s “precautionary principle” is all about avoiding potential risks. The U.S. system often waits for a high level of proof of harm before it acts.

Most of these banned additives aren’t there for nutrition or safety. They’re used for brighter colors, longer shelf life, or easier manufacturing. The simple fact that huge companies like Mars and PepsiCo sell versions of their products in Europe without these chemicals is the ultimate proof that they aren’t needed.

The U.S. food safety system is slow, often lagging years or even decades behind other countries. But a powerful new trend is emerging. States like California are passing their own bans, and consumer pressure is forcing big brands and, eventually, the FDA to phase out controversial ingredients. For now, reading the ingredient label is still your best defense at the grocery store.

Disclaimer This list is solely the author’s opinion based on research and publicly available information. It is not intended to be professional advice.

Like our content? Be sure to follow us.

16 Best Jobs for Pregnant Women

pregnant woman in red holding belly.
red dress Andre Furtado via Canva.

16 Best Jobs for Pregnant Women

Pregnancy is a transformative and joyous period in a woman’s life, but it comes with unique challenges and demands. One of the most crucial aspects during this time is ensuring a healthy work-life balance.

Finding the right job during pregnancy is not just about earning an income; it’s about maintaining your health, well-being, and peace of mind.

How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025—No Experience Needed

Image Credit: dexteris via 123RF

How Total Beginners Are Building Wealth Fast in 2025

I used to think investing was something you did after you were already rich. Like, you needed $10,000 in a suit pocket and a guy named Chad at some fancy firm who knew how to “diversify your portfolio.” Meanwhile, I was just trying to figure out how to stretch $43 to payday.

But a lot has changed. And fast. In 2025, building wealth doesn’t require a finance degree—or even a lot of money. The tools are simpler. The entry points are lower. And believe it or not, total beginners are stacking wins just by starting small and staying consistent.

Click here, and let’s break down how.