Alyssa Milano is revisiting one of the most difficult periods of her life as the Lindsay Clancy trial puts maternal mental health under a national microscope.
The Charmed actress recently reshared her account of suffering severe postpartum anxiety after the 2011 birth of her son, Milo. Milano first wrote about the experience in 2018. Still, the story has taken on new relevance as Clancy’s Massachusetts murder trial examines whether a devastating psychiatric crisis affected her ability to understand her actions.
Milano has made an important distinction: her postpartum anxiety was not postpartum psychosis, the condition at the center of Clancy’s defense. She is not suggesting that her experience explains what happened to Clancy.
Instead, she is raising a broader concern about mothers who desperately need mental-health care and may struggle to get it.
Motherhood Did Not Feel The Way She Expected
Milano’s anxiety began after an experience she had imagined would be one of the happiest moments of her life.
After a difficult labor, she delivered Milo by emergency C-section in 2011. She later recalled feeling guilty that she had not given birth vaginally and had trouble breastfeeding immediately. An intense anxiety attack followed those feelings after she returned home.
The physical symptoms were frightening, with Milano describing a racing heart and overwhelming fear. As a new mother also adjusting to caring for a baby, the experience left her struggling to understand what was happening.
Then another frightening incident involving Milo made the anxiety considerably worse. When her baby developed a high fever and suffered a febrile seizure in her arms, Milano’s fear of something happening to him became much harder to control.
Fear Followed Her Everywhere
Milano began worrying constantly about Milo’s safety, even when she was away from him working.
She has described becoming consumed by thoughts that something terrible might happen to her son while she was at work. She continued her professional responsibilities, but privately she was struggling with increasingly severe anxiety and panic.
The contrast between her public life and private experience became one of the most important parts of her story. To people around her, she was a successful actress and mother carrying on with everyday responsibilities. Inside, she struggled with fears she could not simply switch off.
Eventually, the anxiety became so severe that ordinary routines were no longer enough to contain it.
The Night She Went to a Psychiatric Ward
Milano eventually reached a point where she knew she needed more help than she was receiving.
At around 2 a.m., she went to an emergency room and asked to see a psychiatrist. She ultimately requested admission and spent three days in a psychiatric ward. She later worked with a psychiatrist and therapist as part of her recovery.
Her decision to seek psychiatric treatment became an important part of the story she later shared publicly. Rather than viewing hospitalization as a personal failure, Milano came to see professional treatment as necessary care.
She has also acknowledged that she had advantages many women do not, including health insurance, financial resources, and access to mental-health professionals.
The Clancy Trial Is Asking a Different Question
While Milano’s experience helps illustrate the range of maternal mental-health struggles, the Clancy trial involves a far more severe psychiatric condition and a question of criminal responsibility.
Lindsay Clancy is accused of killing her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan, in their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023 before attempting to end her own life. Clancy’s defense acknowledges that she caused the children’s deaths but argues that postpartum psychosis and other psychiatric problems left her not criminally responsible.
Prosecutors dispute that explanation and argue Clancy understood what she was doing and acted deliberately.
The difference is important. Postpartum anxiety can involve overwhelming worry, panic and intrusive fears, while postpartum psychosis can involve hallucinations, delusions and a severe break from reality.
Save this article
Enter your email address and we'll send it straight to your inbox.
Milano’s decision to speak about her own anxiety therefore should not be interpreted as evidence about Clancy’s mental state.
Witnesses Describe a Mother in Crisis
Some of the most emotional testimony at the trial has come from people who say they watched Clancy’s mental health deteriorate before the killings.
Susan Clancy, Lindsay’s former mother-in-law, testified that Lindsay was “begging for help” and that the family was deeply concerned. Susan described her former daughter-in-law as a loving and nurturing mother who had reached out about insomnia, anxiety and sadness.
Susan also helped connect Lindsay with South Shore Health’s Perinatal Behavioral Health Program after Lindsay said she felt unwell.
Other defense testimony has described paranoia, suicidal thoughts and increasingly unusual behavior in the months before the deaths.
View this post on Instagram
Experts Disagree Sharply
The courtroom has heard two dramatically different psychiatric interpretations of what happened inside Clancy’s mind.
Defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist known for his work on high-profile cases including Andrea Yates, testified that Clancy was “frankly psychotic” when she killed her children. He said she experienced a command hallucination and a “delusion of influence,” describing her as believing she was being controlled like a puppet.
The prosecution’s expert, Dr. Avram Mack, reached the opposite conclusion. He acknowledged major depression but said he found no clear evidence of psychosis or mania and maintained that Clancy retained control over her actions.
The defense has now rested, and closing arguments are expected early next week.
The jury’s task is not to decide whether Clancy was struggling; it is to decide whether that illness made her legally responsible for what happened.
A Conversation That Goes Beyond One Case
Milano’s decision to speak now does not erase the horror of the Clancy case, but it adds another voice to a conversation that is often difficult to have until something goes terribly wrong.
Her own anxiety eventually became manageable with treatment. The Clancy case, meanwhile, has raised much harder questions about severe psychiatric illness, medication, warning signs, and whether the health-care system recognized how serious her deterioration had become.
The legal process will ultimately address those questions, with closing arguments expected next week.
For Milano, however, the message is much simpler: mothers should not have to reach their breaking point before someone takes their suffering seriously. Sometimes the most important intervention happens before a crisis becomes a headline.
Do you think mothers struggling with postpartum mental health problems have enough access to help before their situation becomes a crisis, or is society still too quick to dismiss what new mothers are going through?
Read More:
- 9 Brutal Truths About Motherhood Nobody Warns Women About
- Hundreds Rally Behind Lindsay Clancy — Critics Ask: What About the Three Children?
- Is Parenthood Still Worth It? 8 Reasons More Gen Z Adults Are Thinking Twice About Parenthood
- Lindsay Clancy’s Parents’ $2 Million GoFundMe Raises $817,639 During Trial, Dividing Public Reaction
